What was the controversy concerning Tilted Arc?
The controversy caused by the sculpture Built to stand at 3.7m high and spanning 38m long, the unique feature of the tilted arc was its lean to one side. It would have been a permanent addition to this busy part of the city had the administration taken time to prepare the people before its arrival.Click to see full answer. Also question is, what happened to the Tilted Arc?Richard Serra testifies that the sculpture is site-specific, and that to remove it from its site is to destroy it. Serra’s appeal of the ruling fails. On March 15, 1989, during the night, federal workers cut Tilted Arc into three pieces, remove it from Federal Plaza, and cart it off to a scrap-metal yard.Secondly, why was the Tilted Arc controversial quizlet? Because some people did not want to walk around it, because some people thought it was ugly, because some people thought it would encourage criminal activity, because the artist made it for a specific place and moving it was the equivalent of destroying it. Furthermore, what was the Tilted Arc made of? It has been commissioned by the Arts-in-Architecture program of the U.S. General Services Administration, which earmarks 0.5 percent of a federal building’s cost for artwork. Tilted Arc is a curving wall of raw steel, 120 feet long and 12 feet high, that carves the space of the Federal Plaza in half.What was the medium of Tilted Arc? Sculpture Installation art
ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7pLHLnpmroaSesrSu1LOxZ5ufonuotI6wn5qsXayutHnToZxmm5%2BjwbO71Z6prLFdmLyvr8SrpaKml2LBqrjTnptmmaKYfA%3D%3D